by choki » Saturday 20 March 2004 3:02:53pm
I guess the moderators have to pay a close attention to prevent overheated arguement from both parties and of course editing some errors and stuffs.
As for the line-up of each house team, I suggest house members will arrange a team of 5/6 (the no. still remains unknown until further notice) active people in their own common room. This debate team can be changed after a round of debate to allow more keen participants to take part.
However, the team cannot choose their stand. It will be more of a coin-toss to decide on the stands which two teams take. (this is to prevent everyone from choosing the same and often the percieved 'correct' stand. for eg. smoking law)
Then, again, the topic we choose to debate must be reasonable, like
Capital punishment (death sentence) should be abolished where it is possible to have different views than
Drugs should be banned kind of topic where it is almost impossible to disagree with.