Mistress Siana wrote:btw, Paul, thanks and respect to you!! Most forums don't allow political or religious discussions.
Thanks Mistress Siana and Neo too. Political or religious stuff is welcome here - I've got no problem with big subjects like that at all, as long as there's no serious fighting or abuse against anyone.
Regarding the issues raised here, I was also a little concerned when I first read about wizards turning animals into pin-cushions and other types of inanimate objects. There was a Horizon (science documentary thing) program on BBC TV on 5th February 2003 about near-death experiences, in which a scientific theory which could provide possible answers was aired.
Basically there is scientific theory that there may be a quantum-level explanation of consciousness which could explain how consciousness (or what may be described as the soul) may be able to continue after death.
Quantum theory itself is totally weird. The first thing I ever learned about it was reading a science magazine about 10 years ago about the light interference strangeness which the following page describes:
http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition ... 65,00.htmlThe strangeness is highlighted by the second paragraph on that page (particularly the final sentence of the second paragraph).
I'm definitely not anything near an expert in this, but from the light interference thing, quantum mechanics continues on a very weird but highly scientific basis, to go on to theorise about the possibilities of parallel universes and other seemingly impossible things.
The theory discussed in the Horizon program was along the lines that within the brain, protein assemblies called microtubules are viewed as self-organizing quantum computers. Microtubule subunits (tubulins) are coupled to internal quantum events, and cooperatively interact (compute) with other tubulins.
An important part of the theory is:
Taking all this into consideration, if death occurs (or if an animal is transformed into an inanimate object), somewhere, somehow, the inseparability properties of quantum systems could mean that their "consciousness" or soul is still connected together somewhere/somehow/someuniverse/somedimension, regardless of whether it needs to inhabit another body or the inanimate object itself (which presumably could not feel pain as a pincushion does not have pain receptors).
There are some theories which do agree with Sonkem's idea that inanimate objects may even have consciousness. According to physicist,David Bohm, in a quote from:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/jse.htmHe argues that consciousness is rooted deep in the implicate order, and is therefore present to some degree in all material forms. He suggests that there may be an infinite series of implicate orders, each having both a matter aspect and a consciousness aspect: "everything material is also mental and everything mental is also material, but there are many more infinitely subtle levels of matter than we are aware of" (Weber, 1990, p. 151).
So the Weasleys' car could indeed have a consciousness of its own, and even Moody's dustbins too!
More information about David Bohm can be found at
http://www.muc.de/~heuvel/bohm/ and
http://www.theosophy-nw.org/theosnw/sci ... at-boh.htm
More info about quantum physics and consciousness can be found at:
http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v2/psych ... stapp.html
http://www.consciousness.arizona.edu/ha ... ations.htm
http://www.consciousness.arizona.edu/hameroff/
http://www.consciousness.arizona.edu/ha ... 0Paper.htm
http://www.consciousness.arizona.edu/ha ... rence.html
and a pdf (adobe acrobat reader required) file at
http://pw1.netcom.com/~wolfpapers/myart ... Deepak.pdf
By the way, I was a vegetarian for a year between about March 1986 and the about spring 1987. Gave it up though as it takes a lot of planning to ensure you get the right protein and nutrients, and I ended up feeling really physically tired.