by Mistress Siana » Wednesday 23 February 2005 4:38:56pm
I strongly have to disagree with that. It seems rather like an Anime style of fighting a battle, but not like the way JKR writes. It will not be a matter of who's the stronger or of who has the better plan. There is absolutely no way that JKR will end the series with the impression that rage and whatever consequences rage might have is the solution against threats. That's not the massage a woman like her would want to leave behind.
The key to defeating Voldemort has to be something that only Harry posesses, and it will have to do with love. I don't think Harry will kill Voldemort, if killing means purposely taking his life. I believe the scene in which he failed to cast the Cruciatus curse was more significant than it might seem at first sight. It shows that, no matter who the victim is or what he's done to you, killing is not easy, even if you know you have to. Harry's barely more than a child, I don't think he has in him to kill. Just look at his actions in PoA. He said more than once that he wanted to face Black, that he wished for a chance to avange his parents. But when he was face to face with the actual traitor, he asked for his mercy.
Really, I wanna know: What would happen if he spared Voldemort? What happens if a wizard tries to kill the one he's indebted to? According to DD, this bond is also a piece of ancient magic, just the kind Voldemort underestimated. Couldn't it be that a curse you cast on somebody who's saved your life also backfires, especially as we know that this time, Voldemort isn't immortal.