by Boycey » Wednesday 25 June 2003 11:06:59am
As its called comments and critisisms, I best say I enjoyed this book alot, in fact I wish it didnt end, it might not of been as good as my favorite book which is book 3 but I enjoyed it all the same, and it explained alot, and was another great read for JKR.
But I have sooo many critisms from the book it un real, here is just a few of them to go with yours you have already Lunatech
1. was it just me or was Gwarp turning up just in time just way to convinent, I mean it happened in book 2 with the car, but once you can get away with it, twice just was way to convinent in my veiw,
2. The secetary at the ministry in the telephone box, she let the kids go down the telephone entraince with the explaination of " to save someone" now im sorry, if you say that your buisness it that then there is no way the telephone secertary (real or not), should let you go down to the minisery, otherwise terrorst could quite easliy steal MI5 secrets if it was that easy to get into goverment building
3. Okay I know that there was no security for harry and his gang when he got there, fair enough maybe the death eater dealt with him before hand so they might not have to deal with them, but the death eaters must of gotten in before these attact, like how else would they of known that you cant touch the phophercy, so how did they get in my you could say by stelth, but if hogwarts is stelth free then the ministry certainly should be, otherwise im amazed that this has not happened before, and to get into the mistery of secret too, oh thats just too unbelevie for me.
4. The why was no one on watch at the ministry, what I mean was they was protecting the phophersy that why Mr weasley was attacked as he was on guild at the time, so why was there not another death in the order of phinoex or an alert at lest that Lord Voldemort had attacted and gotten into the ministey, these could only mean there was no one at guard at the time, why not
5. The context of the phophersy, was that really worth protecting, I guess it would be better for Voldemort not to know the context of it, as it would mean that he could not be too sure of what he can and cant do, but I can't see why dumbledore would risk live over it, especailly as no one could touch it apart from Harry.
6. Dumbledore and his list of mistakes, Okay Dumbledore explain why he did not tell harry about the phophersy, but come on Dumbledore what a rookie mistake to do for a wizard not to say, hang on harry what ever you do dont trust your dreams, as Voldemort might minipluate them, this would not give too much away to why Voldemort attacked harry when a kid, and would of solved alot of problems, and for a great wizard like Dumbledore not to realise is just unbeleiveable,
7. My did Lucius Malfoy not just say accio phophersy at the start instead of asking harry to hand it over, okay you could say that maybe Harry had to hand it over, but then why would the death eaters try to use accio on harry then after if this was the case
8. Why run after the kids, just keep on saying accio phophersy, as eventually harry would of let go of it
9. Why is hermonie still alive, why did the death eater not use Advada Kedarvra on her, in fact why did the death eaters use other spells apart from advada kedavra, which is not only deadly, but unblockable
10. how is there not more deaths, there was duels all around, now you would of thought that death eaters would of definatly of used Advada Kedavra on the Order of Phineox, the only thing I can think of is that Advada Kedavra is blockable and the Moody (crouch Jr) lied to harry when he said that you can't block it.
11. Malfoy a prefect, what was Dumbledore thinking
theys lots more, I just cant think of them, but even though I loved the book there was alot of flaws in my opinion in the book, but not to worry I guess.
here come the flames....
