The Next Generation

[Ms. Elsewhere]

Here's what i've been thinking....

Geneve's grandfather is Voldemort. ]
Her mother, is Voldemort's daughter. (this has not been completely revealed in the story, but it can be assumed)
What I'm trying to show is that something has awoken inside her that has something to do with her grandfather.
Marcellus once knew (and possibly worked with, helped or taught) Voldemort, and so may have recruited the help of another person who was loyal to Voldemort with the promise of the same 'glory' Voldemort had preached.
His accomplice COULD be Geneve father who left before she was born?
OR......

These are just some ideas...

Also... THere's another role play that might intermingle with this quite well... what's it called again... Law of the Serpent? It has a whole new group of teachers, all young.. and I think there's a headmaster there too... I'm not sure don't quote me.

But I agree, we need more players because we need to fill in the characters. We can only play one player at a time, right? Maybe we can adopt a character each and play two at once? is that aloud?

Lots to consider... hmmmm....

[FawkesthePhoenix]

good ideas! *gasp* what if grandaddy marcellus was voldemort's "best friend" (or so he'd said) and grand-marcellus adored voldy even after he was killed by him? and he thinks if he brings the dark-lord back he'll truely be his right-hand-man? and geneve's father wanted to share in grandad marcellus's glory?

[Phoenix in the Ashes]

But I agree, we need more players because we need to fill in the characters. We can only play one player at a time, right? Maybe we can adopt a character each and play two at once? is that aloud?

Lots to consider... hmmmm....

It was intended that we should only have one character each, and I agree with that. In an RPG each member should only directly have complete creative control over one character.

That there are plenty of characters in the story without members to control them isn't really much of a problem, because characters without 'owners' are the 'property' of everyone.

So although there's no one specific person controlling them, all other members in that scenario can direct the character how they wish.

[Ms. Elsewhere]

Ok so it's alright to lead these unattached characters. Excellent! I have another idea then. I'll write it in now!

[Phoenix in the Ashes]

Yes, but the main thing to remember when leading unattached characters is that they aren't yours, and you don't own them, so don't get too invested in them. Courtesy prevails too, don't go killing one of them off without warning if others are trying to lead them as well.

I might add a rule about this...

[Ms. Elsewhere]

Of course. I think it's important to observe how the person who created them is leading them and complement that.

[*Riley*]

Sorry but distortia , i got confused by ur last post.

[Ms. Elsewhere]

sorry about that... wrote it quickly. I wanted to give the impression that something was controlling us now. Maybe it's a bit too abstract. How do we delete these things, or is it too late now?

[Phoenix in the Ashes]

Very abstract, I did not get that haha. But there's no need to delete anything, just explain it in the next post.

[Ms. Elsewhere]

ok. I'll take my time with it this time... lol

[*Riley*]

Thanks, and is it ok if i hurt you a little bit.. all in good time..

[Ms. Elsewhere]

lol yes it's ok. I guess the idea is not to actually KILL anybody.... yet.

[Ms. Elsewhere]

Hey everyone, what's that curse called that was on a few ppl in Deathly Hallows? The one where they couldn't control themselves?

[DucksRMagical]

The Imperius Curse. That's the one where someone else controls what you do.

[Ms. Elsewhere]

Ummm... Liam, you're not killing youself, r u???