The 'Trio': Harry, Ron, and Hermione

Who do you like best and who could you definately live without? Will there be romance in the air for any of them and who will end up with who?

Moderators: Mistress Siana, Q.Araignee, Scarlet Lioness

The 'Trio': Harry, Ron, and Hermione

Postby Lizzy Bennet » Friday 4 July 2003 9:01:51pm

I figured, if I started threads about other groups, why not this one? :D

There's another thread about how angry Harry was in book 5, and whilst talking to my Mum about the book today, she was saying that JKR really tapped in to the 'teenage angst' quite well in book 5, which I daresay I have to agree with. I think Harry was a bit OTT (Over-The-Top) in a few instances, but given being 15 *and* having experienced, first-hand, what he did at the end of book 4, I could see how he'd feel as he did (even if he didn't always handle himself well). :-?

It's been mentioned once that Harry is one of the few characters that doesn't have a sense of humour, but I started re-reading book 5 yesterday, and that whole dialogue where he's mocking Dudley (calling him "Big D" and "Diddykins") and saying all this snarky stuff really cracked me up . . . I'll have to hunt up some quotes. I don't think Harry has the humour that Ron has naturally, but I do think he has his moments, even if the moments I recall him being funny are snarky ones. :razz: :lol:

Ron and Hermione being prefects was interesting, and I couldn't help but feel a little sad when Dumbledore told Harry that Harry would have been the 5th year boy prefect had he (Harry) not had so much to handle. I was sad because that would have meant Ron wasn't a prefect. Ron needed an opportunity to shine, and Harry needed to realize that he shouldn't get everything simply because he's Harry, and that being happy for someone else is part of being a good friend. I'm glad, in the end, he supported Ron, even when Ron wasn't doing well with Quidditch. I think what gave Harry the real dose of reality is when Harry saw that his own father wasn't as perfect and wonderful as possibly Harry had thought him to be. :-?

Lastly, whereas I saw several Ron/Hermione moments in book 4 and a few in book 5, I saw quite a few Harry/Hermione moments in book 5. I don't know where JKR is going with that . . . three isn't always a pleasant number . . . one can invariably get left out. I'll be interested to hear your thoughts on the 'Trio' in regards to book 5! :grin:


~ Lizzy :angel:
User avatar
Lizzy Bennet
Angel of Music and Giver of Hugs
 
Posts: 1214
Joined: Monday 2 June 2003 5:35:18pm

Postby Blaise Zabini » Friday 4 July 2003 10:01:21pm

Firstly, Ron. I honestly can't remember what he did in the book. I think that he kind of fell into the background while everything was going on around him. Sure, he played Quidditch, but that even wasn't interesting without Harry in it. I'd really wanted Ron to shine in something that Harry didn't. I was excited when he was made Prefect but then DD said at the end how it should have been Harry. And then Ron was made seeker, but Quidditch is still something that Harry is better at. Ron's a great character, but I don't think he was given as much justice as he deserved.

And Hermione still remained to be her perfect self. More than ever, I noticed that throughout the books she's really done nothing other than be authoritative. She was always right about everything, and that started to annoy me.

I don't know, maybe it was just me, but the Ron and Hermione part of the trio, didn't do much for me on OotP.
User avatar
Blaise Zabini
Fully Qualified Wizard
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Sunday 27 April 2003 3:05:19pm
Location: The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

Postby Lizzy Bennet » Friday 4 July 2003 10:16:32pm

Blaise Zabini wrote:Firstly, Ron. I honestly can't remember what he did in the book. I think that he kind of fell into the background while everything was going on around him. Sure, he played Quidditch, but that even wasn't interesting without Harry in it. I'd really wanted Ron to shine in something that Harry didn't. I was excited when he was made Prefect but then DD said at the end how it should have been Harry. And then Ron was made seeker, but Quidditch is still something that Harry is better at. Ron's a great character, but I don't think he was given as much justice as he deserved.

And Hermione still remained to be her perfect self. More than ever, I noticed that throughout the books she's really done nothing other than be authoritative. She was always right about everything, and that started to annoy me.

I don't know, maybe it was just me, but the Ron and Hermione part of the trio, didn't do much for me on OotP.


Good points, Blaise . . . I completely agree about Ron not getting an opportunity to shine all his own, without Harry somehow overshadowing him even when Ron does get things or is able to do things Harry can't. I felt bad when the Twins kept giving Ron a hard time . . . what's wrong with letting Ron shine or letting up on Ron when he's struggling? Ron ISN'T Percy by any means (even if Ron did become a prefect!), nor do I think Ron ever intended or wanted to steal any limelight from the twins. As for Ron on the Quidditch team, again, I was agitated slightly at the twins because I thought, geez, isn't Ron already getting a hard enough time from the Slytherins? There seemed to be more dischord in the Weasley family in this book than ever before, and sadly, it began with Percy . . . things seemed to improve, sadly enough, when Mr. Weasley was in the hospital . . . I think the twins backed off Ron after that. :)

As for Hermione, I was hoping to see a slightly more human and imperfect Hermione in OotP. Don't get me wrong...I like that Hermione is bright, focused, and takes her studies seriously (it's a great foil for Harry and Ron, if nothing else), but I had to laugh when Hermione got called out by Luna who said something to the effect of Hermione not getting anything unless it's shoved up under her nose in a book. I think sometimes Hermione needs a reality check...just like I REALLY thought Cho needed a reality check, but those feelings are reserved for the 'Cho Chang' thread. :razz:

As I mentioned in my above post, while I understood Harry's anger, it did get on my nerves, after a while, him biting off everyone's head, acting so impetuous, and never seeming sorry. He was, like many of us were/are as teenagers, determined to do it 'his way' and assert himself. Hopefully no one on this forum or anywhere else (though, I'm sure there are some who have :cry: ) have had to 'pay' for this impetuousness/stubornness by losing someone they love...I can't tell you how heartbreaking the mirror and Harry's subsequent conversation with Nearly Headless Nick were. :cry: That made me cry more than the death did initially, because like Harry, I was so confused (about the veil) and stunned (about how accidental the death seemed) at the time!


~ Lizzy :jump:
User avatar
Lizzy Bennet
Angel of Music and Giver of Hugs
 
Posts: 1214
Joined: Monday 2 June 2003 5:35:18pm

Postby Blaise Zabini » Friday 4 July 2003 11:52:20pm

Oh, I know exactly what you mean about the mirror and the conversation with NHN. Both scenes were by far, the most heart-wrenching of the entire series. :cry:

But I'm not sure I agree about Harry's anger being unwarranted. I mean, the kid went through so much. I think that all of his angst and confusion and anger were a necessity. He has endured so much undeserved punishment and sadness and heshould be allowed to get throughly p***d off every once in awhile! No one has apologized to him for what he's had to go through.I don't know, it all just seemed to fit quite well.
User avatar
Blaise Zabini
Fully Qualified Wizard
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Sunday 27 April 2003 3:05:19pm
Location: The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

Postby Lizzy Bennet » Friday 4 July 2003 11:55:37pm

Blaise Zabini wrote:Oh, I know exactly what you mean about the mirror and the conversation with NHN. Both scenes were by far, the most heart-wrenching of the entire series. :cry:

But I'm not sure I agree about Harry's anger being unwarranted. I mean, the kid went through so much. I think that all of his angst and confusion and anger were a necessity. He has endured so much undeserved punishment and sadness and heshould be allowed to get throughly p***d off every once in awhile! No one has apologized to him for what he's had to go through.I don't know, it all just seemed to fit quite well.


I wouldn't say Harry's anger wasn't unwarranted, and you are quite right when you write that he wasn't apologized to. However, 'once and a while' and almost all of the time, which it seemed like, in parts, are two different things. :) Sure, I wouldn't expect Harry, at 15 and given what he's gone through, to be happy-go-lucky (that'd be unrealistic and hokey), but sometimes it seemed he was over-the-top. Just my opinion, though. :) I wouldn't describe it as sad, per se, but it was haunting when Hermione said she wished she could see the threstals, and Harry painfully informed her that she doesn't really ever want that wish to come true. :cry:


~ Lizzy :jump:
User avatar
Lizzy Bennet
Angel of Music and Giver of Hugs
 
Posts: 1214
Joined: Monday 2 June 2003 5:35:18pm

Postby Blaise Zabini » Saturday 5 July 2003 12:03:35am

It seemed to me, though, that Harry's anger lessened as the book progressed. At the beginning, he was...well, quite angry at the world. But after he had the initial outburst at headquarters, he seemed to calm down a bit, ne? I'll have to continue my re-reading (which seems to be taking eons) to check, but that's how I remember things.

Oh, and I agree about Hermione's talking about the thestrals. That definitely struck me as being eerie when I read it, too. :-?

And on a complete side note, the hopping smiley face is going in slow motion. I've no idea why it's doing so, but it just may be the coolest thing ever...
User avatar
Blaise Zabini
Fully Qualified Wizard
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Sunday 27 April 2003 3:05:19pm
Location: The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

Postby Lizzy Bennet » Saturday 5 July 2003 12:10:04am

Blaise Zabini wrote:It seemed to me, though, that Harry's anger lessened as the book progressed. At the beginning, he was...well, quite angry at the world. But after he had the initial outburst at headquarters, he seemed to calm down a bit, ne? I'll have to continue my re-reading (which seems to be taking eons) to check, but that's how I remember things.

Oh, and I agree about Hermione's talking about the thestrals. That definitely struck me as being eerie when I read it, too. :-?

And on a complete side note, the hopping smiley face is going in slow motion. I've no idea why it's doing so, but it just may be the coolest thing ever...


LOL @ the slo-mo smiley! :lol: What freaked me out was when Holly had double-smileys all across the pages, and they were all jumping up and down in a syncronized way! :razz:

On-topic, you're right about Harry...he calms down as he gets information and as the book progresses. Sadly, in the end, he realizes (or I realized, I'll have to keep re-reading as well...it's taking me a while...I'm only on chapter 2! :eek: ) after wanting to have all the answers and know everything, he sees what it cost him. :( The end of the book hit me hard...not when Sirius died, but the aftermath: the guilt, the realizations, the horrible discovery of desiring to know the answers cost him (Harry), etc.... :cry:


~ Lizzy Bee :angel:
User avatar
Lizzy Bennet
Angel of Music and Giver of Hugs
 
Posts: 1214
Joined: Monday 2 June 2003 5:35:18pm

Postby Blaise Zabini » Saturday 5 July 2003 12:21:22am

Yeah, what is it with the difficulty in re-reading this book?! I think there's a topic somewhere about that, but it's driving me crazy! Meh, am stuck on chapter four...

But, ahem. As we the venerable moderators keep drifting off topic. Anyway, even more than Harry's wanting to know the answer to everything causing Sirius's death, what I found the worst was that his love for his godfather also played an influential part in causing his loss. I mean, it was so tragic and ironic that Sirius was really the only character whom Harry really looked up to and had love for and it was this that played a part in his death. Had Harry not been so zealous and had he not cared for his Godfather so much, no harm would have come to him. It was this, more than anything, that hit me the hardest. :cry:
User avatar
Blaise Zabini
Fully Qualified Wizard
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Sunday 27 April 2003 3:05:19pm
Location: The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

Postby Eol » Tuesday 12 August 2003 10:59:33am

Am I just imagining it or has ron gotten a bit dense in the 5th book. There are many instances where he seems completely oblivious to things which are obvious to both Harry and Hermione. E.g. Malfoys hint about knowing the dog was sirius on the platform.
User avatar
Eol
Lightning Bearer
 
Posts: 281
Joined: Saturday 2 August 2003 10:38:51am
Location: Over there

Postby Meg Boyd » Wednesday 13 August 2003 1:42:16pm

Well...perhaps not dense...JKR prolly wanted somethings to stand out more...just incase us readers didn't catch it...so the best way to explain things like that is to have a character miss the details too so another character has to back up and explain...Ron is the easiest target to that since he isn't a genius like Hermione or paranoid like Harry. He isn't dense, just handy, at least that's my take on it.
User avatar
Meg Boyd
Head Girl, Ravenclaw Prefect and Maker of Witty Random Statements Since 1986 A.D.
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Tuesday 1 July 2003 2:14:00am
Location: The Guilt Show

Postby Dink Meeker » Wednesday 13 August 2003 2:01:21pm

Well said Meg. I agree whole heartedly. In addition to this, sometimes I get the feeling that Ron just isn't listening attentively or his mind is wandering off. You know.... a typical teenager.
User avatar
Dink Meeker
Seeker of the Light
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Wednesday 16 July 2003 4:56:44pm
Location: The Forbidden Forest

Postby Meg Boyd » Wednesday 13 August 2003 2:12:18pm

Huey wrote:Well said Meg. I agree whole heartedly. In addition to this, sometimes I get the feeling that Ron just isn't listening attentively or his mind is wandering off. You know.... a typical teenager.


he he he...I was going to make the teenager point, but then since I am teenager, I didn't want to make teenagers look bad....lol...he he
User avatar
Meg Boyd
Head Girl, Ravenclaw Prefect and Maker of Witty Random Statements Since 1986 A.D.
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Tuesday 1 July 2003 2:14:00am
Location: The Guilt Show

Postby highsorcerer » Sunday 31 August 2003 3:55:23am

Being a teenager is a part of life... and a hard one. You are not a child, but not an adult. As an adult, I would NEVER relive my teenage years. They were horrible.

Plus, I stand behind what I said before... Harry, Ginny, Luna, and Neville lasted longer in the battle of the DoM because they understood what they faced. Ron and Hermoine don't know it yet. And the two with the biggest horrors of their past (Harry and Neville) lasted the longest because the understood evil the best.

Ron and Hermoine just don't know the horrors of pain - Harry's parent's killed, Nevillle's tortured into insaninty, Ginny being possesssed, or Luna's loss of her mother. Maybe that is why they fell first -because they didn't understand the true horror of evil.
User avatar
highsorcerer
Department of Mysteries Unspeakable and Registered Animagus (Parrot)
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Monday 23 June 2003 9:28:23am
Location: Area 51 (Headquarters, US Department of Mysteries)

Postby hedwigslove57 » Monday 1 September 2003 9:10:47pm

about the hermione/ron thing...i think that they have always had a thing. if you notice they are always bickering and most people are like that when they are together, also ron always seemed to care about hermione getting hurt or being sad a little more than harry did (with the exceptions of when ron was the one being a git to her!) i think harry doesnt have a chance with her its so ron and hermione! :D 8)
User avatar
hedwigslove57
Fourth Year
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Monday 1 September 2003 7:00:14am
Location: buckeye state~!~


Return to Characters

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron