As of late I have been feeling very anti-gun because there was just a massive shooting in my are. But what I find to be more interesting rather than if it is moral or not, is if it actually is technically legal to own a gun. We all know that the second amendment says that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed". But a lot of people don't know the whole thing reads "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
The militia that is mentioned no longer exists. It has basically transformed into the National Guard. So the second amendment very well actually mean that only National Guardsmen and women are legally guaranteed that right to have a firearm.
On a less sirius note, wouldn't it be funny if the writers actually meant the right to have a bears arms rather than own munitions?