Anna Black wrote:Voldemort tried to kill baby Harry in order to wipe out competition, to rid himself of any powerful uprisers.
Harry as a horcrux doesn't make sense to me because LV can only be killed once all his horcruxes are destroyed. That would be Harry if he were a hcrx. Harry would have to die. I'm certain that's not how it is. I believe the story as it lies:
ring, diary, locket, Nagini, Hufflepuff's cup, something of Rclaw's or Gryff's, Voldemort himself
Well it would destroy many hearts if Harry's character had to die wouldn't it. We've spent x number of years reading about his fate. I hope he's not the last horcrux as I think I'd be devastated. In fact thinking about it he can't be - in GOF LV used Avada Kedavra (or however you spell it!) on Harry - that would have killed him if Harry hadn't repelled and the wands didn't connect - why would LV himself want to destroy one of his own horcruxes??!!
At the moment I'm also undecided whether Nagini is a horcrux and DD said he wasn't sure. Harry's already killed a snake like creature so this would be a bit repetitive wouldn't it. Also I'm sure Dumbledore said something about using animals as horcruxes might not be as effective blah blah..
Regardless of whether Nagini is a horcrux or not, do we know how long LV has had Nagini and who looked after Nagini while he was without his body? He would need to know his horcruxes were safeguarded somehow and would not move about all over the place. I can't imagine LV inprisoning Nagini if Nagini was a horcrux. So for me Nagini is out as well.
Also, when LV came back in GOF, surely he would have already used a horcrux at this point? Do we think JKR made a slip here? Or is it intended that Harry/Hermione will realise he's already used one in the final book?
Something is certainly not right anyway...