Well if he's going for the power, and if his intentions are to become the next dark lord, he'll won't be giving his life for Draco or for anyone else. More likely he will try to make Draco a servent or something like that.
And I don't really recall Snape showing any sympathie for anyone. Not even Draco. So why would he be doing anything like that. As for giving his life for Harry that would be more of a way to recieve forgiveness for killing Dumbledore... It would be for him. Whom I believe he, if not liked, then at least respected or something... (I'm kinda missing the word now)
For Those Of Us Still In Denial Over Dumbledore
Moderators: Nightcrawler, Scarlet Lioness, FawkesthePhoenix, Lone_Buck, paintballdecoy
by SunsetG|rl » Monday 10 October 2005 1:26:46pm
-
SunsetG|rl - Moon Bunny Chaser
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Tuesday 9 August 2005 9:59:25am
- Location: Chasing the Rabit on the Moon
by nikki000 » Monday 10 October 2005 4:47:09pm
OOOOOOOOR: Draco will save Harry. I do not know.... I somehow expect that there will be a 'Everybody no matter how Evil can Turn Good' kind of message at the end. It cannot simply be that Harry wins in the end and they all live happily ever after.
As long as Dumbledore somehow returns.... (although had it been any other book or any other character I would have mocked the whole 'Return from the Dead' thing which reminds me a bit of soap operas, e.g. 'Dirty Den' for those of you familiar with British Soaps. - But seeing that it is DD.....
)
As long as Dumbledore somehow returns.... (although had it been any other book or any other character I would have mocked the whole 'Return from the Dead' thing which reminds me a bit of soap operas, e.g. 'Dirty Den' for those of you familiar with British Soaps. - But seeing that it is DD.....
)-
nikki000 - Muggle
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Friday 7 October 2005 1:50:21pm
- Location: Britain
by nikki000 » Monday 10 October 2005 4:49:44pm
SunsetG|rl wrote:And I don't really recall Snape showing any sympathie for anyone.
Well, I am not saying it was out of sympathy but he did sort of save Harry in the first (?) book during Quidditch....
-
nikki000 - Muggle
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Friday 7 October 2005 1:50:21pm
- Location: Britain
by Phoenix in the Ashes » Tuesday 11 October 2005 5:00:45am
Yes well that just shows how much he hated Harry's father and couldn't stand his memory haunting him.
And I very much doubt that would be the moraL, I think it'll be somethign more along the lines of:
Everybody deserves a second chance, but if they scr*w it up to hell with them
That's a more Dumbeldoreish reply.
And I very much doubt that would be the moraL, I think it'll be somethign more along the lines of:
Everybody deserves a second chance, but if they scr*w it up to hell with them
That's a more Dumbeldoreish reply.
-
Phoenix in the Ashes - Guardian of the Vault, RPG Moderator and Slytherin Prefect
- Posts: 5352
- Joined: Monday 24 January 2005 6:45:40am
- Location: Wandering around the RPG Area
by Phoenix in the Ashes » Wednesday 12 October 2005 4:06:10am
Obviously he wouldn't have sworn, but the first half is fairly accurate.
There are only so many chances you can give people, and I for one believe that DD believed everyone could change and that they deserved a second chance.
But there's always a time when patience runs out.
He's not gonna go and give Voldemort another chance, is he?
Yet he did Snape.
2.
There are only so many chances you can give people, and I for one believe that DD believed everyone could change and that they deserved a second chance.
But there's always a time when patience runs out.
He's not gonna go and give Voldemort another chance, is he?
Yet he did Snape.
2.
-
Phoenix in the Ashes - Guardian of the Vault, RPG Moderator and Slytherin Prefect
- Posts: 5352
- Joined: Monday 24 January 2005 6:45:40am
- Location: Wandering around the RPG Area
by Dawn The Tawny » Friday 14 October 2005 2:43:31pm
I find this whole Snape thing so confusing! I just wish we knew what was going on. I'm so impatient and I can't wait to find out why DD trusted Snape. I just hope it's not really lame!
-
Dawn The Tawny - First Year Student in Witchcraft and Wizardry
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tuesday 11 October 2005 12:05:53pm
by Arun » Saturday 15 October 2005 12:58:03am
Anyway, wasn't the horcrux so evil that it wasn't mentioned in the Hogwarts library?
I don't know about you, but I do not think AT ALL that Dumbledore was even slightly evil.
I don't know about you, but I do not think AT ALL that Dumbledore was even slightly evil.
-
Arun - Head of Order of the Pheonix Branch in Florida, Hunter of the Crumple-Horned Snorkack and Gryffindor Prefect
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Monday 18 July 2005 2:46:41pm
- Location: Somewhere in the hidden depths of my closet
by Phoenix in the Ashes » Saturday 15 October 2005 9:03:33am
Yes I agree, as I said it's an insult to his memory.
-
Phoenix in the Ashes - Guardian of the Vault, RPG Moderator and Slytherin Prefect
- Posts: 5352
- Joined: Monday 24 January 2005 6:45:40am
- Location: Wandering around the RPG Area
by Aberforth » Monday 17 October 2005 9:43:34am
The chocolate frog card doesn't say DD killed grindlewald, just defeated him (although JKR has said grindlewald is currently deceased - hp lexicon). So DD may not have had to use the killing curse at all.
-
Aberforth - Hogs Head Bartender
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Tuesday 17 February 2004 5:10:14pm
- Location: Hogs Head, Hogsmeade
by Phoenix in the Ashes » Tuesday 18 October 2005 4:14:49am
Avada Kedavra is the killing curse obviously... The only spell that can't be blocked.
But there's never been anything said that it was the only killing curse. There are probably many different spells that can cause fatalities, maybe they can be blocked though. Avada Kedavra just has a very evil label put on it.
And of course you're right, it just said he was defeated, not killed.
But there's never been anything said that it was the only killing curse. There are probably many different spells that can cause fatalities, maybe they can be blocked though. Avada Kedavra just has a very evil label put on it.
And of course you're right, it just said he was defeated, not killed.
-
Phoenix in the Ashes - Guardian of the Vault, RPG Moderator and Slytherin Prefect
- Posts: 5352
- Joined: Monday 24 January 2005 6:45:40am
- Location: Wandering around the RPG Area
by crystallised_pineapple » Monday 31 October 2005 3:55:45pm
i don't know i always thought that was the only one, because surely it would be an unforgivable curse and there are only three...
-
crystallised_pineapple - Queen of The Pixies
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Monday 18 July 2005 7:12:25pm
- Location: three broomsticks :D surrounded by empty butterbeer bottles...he he
by SunsetG|rl » Monday 31 October 2005 7:27:30pm
I wonder if sectum sempra could kill?
What do you think? It seemed pretty powerfull...
What do you think? It seemed pretty powerfull...
-
SunsetG|rl - Moon Bunny Chaser
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Tuesday 9 August 2005 9:59:25am
- Location: Chasing the Rabit on the Moon
by Arun » Monday 31 October 2005 7:51:18pm
SunsetG|rl wrote:I wonder if sectum sempra could kill?
What do you think? It seemed pretty powerfull...
That's true.
What is someone used that and just let them bleed to death?
Interesting.
-
Arun - Head of Order of the Pheonix Branch in Florida, Hunter of the Crumple-Horned Snorkack and Gryffindor Prefect
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Monday 18 July 2005 2:46:41pm
- Location: Somewhere in the hidden depths of my closet
by Tanuki » Monday 31 October 2005 11:07:28pm
I think teh whole point is to let them bleed to death. However, I think it can be blocked, as opposed to AK which appears to be mostly unblockable by magic
-
Tanuki - The Mad Dog of Slytherin
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: Tuesday 11 January 2005 9:25:52pm
- Location: New York NY
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests