He didn't die, Harry saved him!

A place to discuss your Harry Potter theories. Are there hidden secrets and conspiracies? What will happen in future plots? The truth may be in here!

Moderators: Nightcrawler, Scarlet Lioness, FawkesthePhoenix, Lone_Buck, paintballdecoy

Postby Mint » Tuesday 28 October 2003 4:43:53pm

:o So if u go to the past - something will happen to contradict what u r about to change - so that future will stay the same. How about that?

May be Harry would be in the situation he was in - if he wouldn't try to go to the past to change it.


...........this time stuff is waay too confusing...
User avatar
Mint
Slytherin Prefect, Hogwarts Librarian and Milady of the Night
 
Posts: 2782
Joined: Wednesday 16 April 2003 2:30:46pm
Location: Chasing evil duck commander Choki >:( on a chocobo!!!

Postby Violet » Wednesday 29 October 2003 11:50:55am

lol, i know what u mean. i think it's difficult as JK hasnt put any definition on it. She hasnt distinguished between when an event is supposed to happen, and when it isnt. or why sometimes u're allowed to go back and change things and why other times you arent.
User avatar
Violet
Serpentine Princess
 
Posts: 1163
Joined: Monday 2 June 2003 11:31:00pm
Location: Room of requirement training the monkeys!!

Postby Meg Boyd » Sunday 2 November 2003 7:39:10pm

perhaps you can save people from dying, but you can't bring people back from the dead. In POA, Harry goes back in time and prevents Sirius from being in a situation in where he could be harmed. At that moment, Sirius had been alive, and was about to be administered the Kiss from the dementors. He never died, see, so when they saved him they were merely rescueing him from harms way. In OotP, Sirius died. If Harry should go back in time to save Sirius it would involve changing something incredibly permenate (sp). If it was so easy to save someone with a TT, Harry just might have his family. I am sure there are things dealing with TT that are extremely forbidden since they can drastically alter the past, present, and future. One of these probably being situations dealing with death, such as going back in time and killing someone, or saving someone from a death that has already happened. Lets say if they did go back in time and killed LV when he was a baby, LV's family would be alive, countless wizards would be alive, and even muggles. In theory such an addition of lives to the present would incredibly alter time. Death can change worlds at an instant, and I am sure the ministry (as lax as it is) has laws to prevent usage of TTs in situations dealing with death. If you ever want a good example of the slightest effect on time the many parallel universes invloving time one ought to view The Back to the Future films, especially the second one.
User avatar
Meg Boyd
Head Girl, Ravenclaw Prefect and Maker of Witty Random Statements Since 1986 A.D.
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Tuesday 1 July 2003 2:14:00am
Location: The Guilt Show

Postby menotyoo » Sunday 2 November 2003 8:14:33pm

Back 2 the Future 2 is a perfect example, but I didn't see using the timeturners like that. It seemed like everything that happened when they went back, they had already done. Hagrid screams and they heard the axe chop. But really that was a scream of joy and macnair was angry so he had chopped the fence. So whatever they changed, they weren't really changing, they were completing the past.
Please don't assume that I am inside JKR's head on this one, b/c it is really complex....
I just don't want sirius to be dead. Any way to present his murder would please me. The fact that she just says that a spell hits him- not saying red or green- when she had taken the time to say that hermione was hit with a purple flame spell or w/e, makes me wonder.
Either way, I wouldn't expect harry to alter the past, just complete it by pulling sirius into the veil w/o people seeing him. Since his parents actually died, and all that---changing the past wouldn't work, in this case, he would be making the scene look exactly the same, so it would look to everyone like he died. If that makes any sense.
Sirius cannot be dead! :x
User avatar
menotyoo
Sixth Year
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Tuesday 30 September 2003 1:18:21am
Location: Durvish and Banges, Knockturn Alley, London, England, Europe, Earth

Postby pinky p » Wednesday 12 November 2003 12:23:24am

it wouldn't be much of a series, would it, if everytime something didn't go harry's way he went back in time and fixed it? :razz:
pinky p
Supreme Pie-Eater, Registered Animagus (Platypus) and Princess of All Pink Grapefruit
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tuesday 19 August 2003 9:59:49pm
Location: either swimming, sleeping, eating, or doing schoolwork... my life these days

Postby Mistress Siana » Wednesday 12 November 2003 3:09:05pm

Maybe there is a limit, so you cannot go back in time for more than...maybe ten hours or so. Can't remember how far they went back in PoA.
User avatar
Mistress Siana
Slytherin Chaser and Devil's advocate
 
Posts: 1862
Joined: Thursday 12 December 2002 5:40:13pm
Location: Palace of Tears

Postby Iluvatar » Wednesday 12 November 2003 3:34:15pm

Harry CANNOT use a timeturner to save Harry I explained this once in the Book 5 theories section so I won't expain it again here because it quite longwinded. I'll try to put a link to the page. Just scroll through the thread until you find my post (It was my very first post by the way)

http://www.broomsticksandowls.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1627&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

If the link doesn't work then look on the second page of the Book 5 theories section for a thread called TimeTurner Problem. My reasoning is on the first page of the thread

Iluvatar Allmighty Ruler of Ea
Iluvatar
Fully Qualified Wizard
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Wednesday 16 July 2003 9:57:15am
Location: Switzerland

Postby Jotomicron » Wednesday 12 November 2003 3:53:21pm

Iluvatar wrote:Harry CANNOT use a timeturner to save Harry I explained this once in the Book 5 theories section so I won't expain it again here because it quite longwinded. I'll try to put a link to the page. Just scroll through the thread until you find my post (It was my very first post by the way)

http://www.broomsticksandowls.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1627&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
(...)


I read it, I understand it... I still think there is some way of saving him...

You say that when someone is already dead and you go to the past and save him, your incentive vanishes. I agree... But what would happen if:

*Harry begins the sixth year in September;
*Hears someone (DD, for instance) explaining this theory;
*In October goes back in time and saves Sirius (we don't know what happens when somebody gets through the veil, so it would be possible, at least I think it is...);
*Says Sirius to hide until November. About that time, Harry would already have gone to the past and saved Sirius, so, Sirius could show up and say he is alive even without making the incentive vanish!

It is very hard to explain it better (and yet I took so much time to write this post... :oops: ), but I hope I have made myself clear!

However, and dispite my theory, I do think Sirius is really dead :cry: :cry:
Jotomicron
Producer of Happiness and Mysterious Metamorphmagus
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wednesday 10 September 2003 1:37:07am

Postby menotyoo » Wednesday 12 November 2003 10:48:12pm

that is mostly my point(I think) Jotomicron.
Harry thinks he saw Sirius die as we see, so if in the future he goes into the past and saves Sirius without himself seeing (as I've said, by pulling him through the veil w/o others seeing that he does so) he will still have incentive to save him in the future.
User avatar
menotyoo
Sixth Year
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Tuesday 30 September 2003 1:18:21am
Location: Durvish and Banges, Knockturn Alley, London, England, Europe, Earth

Postby Athena Appleton » Tuesday 27 January 2004 9:38:52pm

Face it, Sirius is dead. Not every story ends with a Happily Ever After. If you don't believe that, think about this. Sirius spent the entire book 5 feeling upset that he was sitting around Number 12 Grimmauld Place doing nothing. He died in the heat of battle. He would not take it well if Harry went back and made it so that he got to be out of danger's way again, would he?
User avatar
Athena Appleton
Hogwarts Librarian, Headmistress of the Little Wizards Academy and Kisser of Boo-boos
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Sunday 25 January 2004 6:42:54am
Location: Easin' down the yellow brick road....

Postby Meg Boyd » Wednesday 28 January 2004 3:27:42am

I totally agree...its kinda like the code of honor that samurai had (forgive me if I am incorrect) where it was kinda like one is better of dying with honor than losing and staying out of harms way. Sirius would have liked knowing that he died fighting evil, it is proper
User avatar
Meg Boyd
Head Girl, Ravenclaw Prefect and Maker of Witty Random Statements Since 1986 A.D.
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Tuesday 1 July 2003 2:14:00am
Location: The Guilt Show

Postby Jotomicron » Thursday 29 January 2004 3:55:02pm

I'm with you: Sirius's dead! :cry:
And Meg and Athena explained it so well, I'm not able to contradict!!


Nevertheless, it's so funny to discuss time travel theories!!! :razz:
Jotomicron
Producer of Happiness and Mysterious Metamorphmagus
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wednesday 10 September 2003 1:37:07am

Postby Ferrus » Sunday 1 February 2004 3:09:24pm

well, we dont actually KNOW what is behind (through) the veil, everyone assumes that whatever it was, it killed Sirius, but did it?
Its a question worth considering...
User avatar
Ferrus
Fully Qualified Wizard
 
Posts: 1066
Joined: Sunday 18 January 2004 1:50:04pm
Location: Returned from the Land of Temporal Oblivion

Postby Phaerie » Sunday 1 February 2004 5:47:48pm

i know we've kinda got over the time travel theory, but (and i haven't) if you actually sit down and calculate the number of times you'd have to turn the timeturner over to get back i time to save sirius purely by the end of book 5 it is rather a large amount. Plus they don't actually have a time turner anymore.

Think Sirius died to teach harry a few lessons
1. there is stuff in life worth dieing for
2. to be less stubborn and proud- it was harry's stubbornes which ultimately lead to sirius's death, like if he'd learnt occlumency.
3. Kind of leading on from 2 to take resposibility for his actions.
User avatar
Phaerie
Princess of Rainbows, Moonlight Dreamer and Gryffindor Prefect
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Tuesday 13 January 2004 8:32:06pm
Location: Doing double backs on a trampoline and scaring her spotters!

Postby Meg Boyd » Sunday 1 February 2004 7:33:58pm

Well said Phaerie. I agree with you completely that Sirius needed to die (as sick as that sounds) so Harry could fully realize the need for a higher standard of focus to ultimately achieve his goal
User avatar
Meg Boyd
Head Girl, Ravenclaw Prefect and Maker of Witty Random Statements Since 1986 A.D.
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Tuesday 1 July 2003 2:14:00am
Location: The Guilt Show

PreviousNext

Return to Theories

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron