Mummys, I'm interupting the conversation but I'm just an aunty
I think HP isn't appropriate for under 10 yrs - there are simply too much things they wouldn't understand
. Social satyre (Dursleys), corruption at the ministry(Fudge, Crouch), sadism (Bella), mentally disabled people (Longbottoms), ...
Actually it's not moral reasons what make me think HP's not for kids. But if you don't understand the contents you can't fully enjoy the book. Anyway, HP series is still very innocent. No dirty words, no s*x, no profaning, ...
But if they want to watch it they'll bear the consequences themselves. I read Oliver Twist when I was 10 - the book was too serius&difficult
for me and I still can't stand Dickens. But according to the fact my favourite writer is Frederic Beigbeder, it's probably normal I can't stand Dickens
Well, if you want all the toddlers to see the HP, just immitate Umbridge & put age barrier on it! Yes, even babies have their own will, their own personality, but they can't read
I think books are scarier than movies - when I was reading CoS, I crawled in the corner of my room
but read on of course 8) . I was scared before I knew who made the bodiless voice.
But - come on, Eos!!! - in the movie basilisk wasn't frightening. It didn't look like a snake at all but like an (artificial) dragon. He was intended to be very scary but for me less=more.
I didn't know Parvati&Padma were Indians (from India or native Americans???) I've always imagined them as Italians, the names sounded Italian to me. And they were always described having long black hair - they could be Mediterranean beauty as well. Hey, I'm not Italian, but a bit Mediterranean yes. I come from Slovenia and don't have black hair, for information
but darkblond-lightbrown-ashes died on dark violet. How complicated
offtopic again